The landscape of facial aesthetics is undergoing a paradigm shift. For decades, the gold standard for addressing facial aging has been the surgical facelift—a procedure designed to tighten loose skin and reposition underlying tissues. However, plastic surgeons have long recognized a fundamental limitation: surgery alone often fails to address the complex, multifaceted nature of aging, such as sun damage, loss of skin elasticity, and the depletion of facial volume.
A landmark study published in the July issue of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery®, the official medical journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS), suggests that a more comprehensive, "all-in-one" approach may be the future of facial rejuvenation. By combining face and neck lift surgery with plasma skin resurfacing, full-face fat grafting, and advanced regenerative treatments, surgeons are now able to address multiple layers of aging in a single operation.
The Multidimensional Nature of Facial Aging
To understand why this combined approach is gaining traction, one must first understand that aging is not a singular event. It is a biological process that impacts the face on three distinct levels: the structural support (muscles and connective tissue), the subcutaneous volume (fat), and the surface (skin quality).
Traditionally, a facelift focuses on the "envelope" of the face. By tightening the underlying SMAS (superficial musculoaponeurotic system) layer and removing excess skin, surgeons can effectively combat sagging. Yet, as Dr. Melinda Lacerna Kimbrell, a plastic surgeon at LA Plastic Surgery in Bradenton, Florida, and lead author of the study, notes, "Facelifts alone do not address the skin aging. Facelifts alone do not address volume loss."
Patients frequently present with a "triad" of concerns: structural descent, loss of youthful fullness, and compromised skin health characterized by fine lines, hyperpigmentation, and thinning. The study, which reviewed the experiences of 96 patients, demonstrates that by integrating surgical lifting with regenerative medicine, practitioners can achieve a harmonious result that addresses the face as a holistic unit rather than a collection of separate issues.
A Chronology of the Clinical Study
The research conducted by Dr. Lacerna provides a detailed roadmap for this high-level intervention. The study followed a cohort of 96 patients over a specific period, documenting the outcomes of a multi-modal protocol.
Phase 1: Surgical Repositioning
The procedure begins with a standard face and neck lift. This foundation is essential, as it provides the necessary structural correction by lifting sagging tissues. Unlike older techniques that focused solely on pulling skin tight—often resulting in an unnatural "pulled" look—modern techniques emphasize the vertical or vector-based repositioning of deeper tissues.
Phase 2: Volumetric Restoration
Following the lift, surgeons performed full-face fat grafting. This step is critical for replacing the fat pads that naturally diminish with age. By harvesting fat from other areas of the body and carefully placing it into the cheeks, temples, and under-eye areas, surgeons restore the "triangle of youth" that is often lost in mid-life.
Phase 3: Plasma Skin Resurfacing
Once the structure and volume are addressed, the focus shifts to the surface. The study utilized deep plasma skin resurfacing, a technology that uses ionized gas to remove old, damaged skin cells and stimulate the production of fresh, healthy collagen. Unlike chemical peels or laser treatments, which can sometimes be too aggressive for certain skin tones, plasma devices can be calibrated. Dr. Lacerna utilized either low-intensity helium or nitrogen plasma devices, tailoring the energy output to the specific pigment and texture of each patient’s skin.
Phase 4: Regenerative Support
The final, and perhaps most innovative, component of the protocol is the application of topical regenerative treatments. This includes the use of nanofat cream and exosomes. These biological agents promote faster healing, reduce inflammation, and provide the building blocks necessary for the skin to repair itself after the trauma of surgery and resurfacing.
Supporting Data: Quantifying Rejuvenation
One of the most compelling aspects of the study is the objective data used to measure success. Relying on subjective "before and after" photos is common in plastic surgery, but this research employed standardized skin scanning technology to assign a numerical "skin age" to patients.
The results were statistically significant:
- Skin Age: An average improvement of four years.
- Elasticity: An average improvement of nearly 10 years.
- Wrinkle Reduction: An average improvement of seven years.
These metrics provide a quantifiable validation of the procedure’s efficacy. More importantly, the study addressed the primary concern that has historically deterred surgeons from combining these procedures: the risk of complications.
Traditionally, surgeons were wary of performing deep resurfacing alongside a facelift, fearing that the compromised blood supply to the skin flap—a natural consequence of lifting—might lead to necrosis or delayed healing. However, Dr. Lacerna’s cohort showed no increased risk of complications. The integration of regenerative medicine appears to be the "secret sauce" that stabilizes the tissues, promotes vascularity, and allows the skin to tolerate both the surgical lift and the intensive resurfacing simultaneously.
Official Responses and Clinical Implications
Dr. Lacerna emphasizes that the success of this approach is inextricably linked to the regenerative component. "This is a very safe and effective procedure combination," she states. "But I think the key is regenerative medicine. I would not do this without regenerative medicine, without the fat grafting, without using nanofat cream, without exosomes for topical healing."
The implications for the patient experience are substantial. Combining these procedures into a single operation offers three distinct advantages:
- Economic Efficiency: By consolidating the procedures, patients may only face a single surgical facility fee, single anesthesia fee, and single surgeon’s fee, rather than paying for disparate treatments performed months apart.
- Safety Profile: While anesthesia carries inherent risks, subjecting a patient to one extended surgery is generally considered safer than placing them under anesthesia for multiple separate procedures over the course of a year.
- Unified Recovery: While the initial recovery from a combined procedure is intensive, it eliminates the "stacking" of recovery periods. Patients undergo one period of downtime rather than three or four, allowing them to return to their normal routines more efficiently.
The Future of "Cool" Plasma and Beyond
While the results of this study are promising, the medical community remains cautious and forward-looking. Dr. Lacerna acknowledges that the field is still evolving. Future research is already being directed toward the integration of newer, FDA-approved "cool" plasma devices, which promise to provide similar resurfacing benefits with even less thermal damage to the skin.
Furthermore, the study highlights the need for larger, multi-center trials to ensure that these results are reproducible across different surgical populations. Patient satisfaction studies—which measure not just the numerical improvement in skin age but the patient’s psychological well-being and quality of life—will be the next frontier in validating this combined approach.
A Synthesis of Science and Art
The shift toward this "all-in-one" model represents a maturation of the specialty. Plastic surgery is no longer just about cutting and sewing; it is increasingly about biological management. By viewing the face as a complex ecosystem that requires both structural, volumetric, and cellular support, surgeons are moving closer to the goal of "natural" rejuvenation.
For patients, the message is clear: facial aging is a total-surface issue that requires a total-surface solution. As surgeons continue to refine the use of exosomes, nanofat, and precision plasma technology, the standard of care is likely to move away from isolated procedures toward these synergistic, restorative protocols.
As the industry looks to the future, organizations like the American Society of Plastic Surgeons continue to prioritize the rigorous evaluation of these techniques. By bridging the gap between traditional surgical mechanics and the cutting-edge science of regenerative medicine, the medical community is not just turning back the clock—it is fundamentally changing how we age.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult with a board-certified plastic surgeon to discuss which procedures are appropriate for your specific needs, health history, and skin type.
About the Author
